Travel Photos, Sony A7rII & Leica Glass

Update:

While I adore the A7 system, I recently fell in love with the Fujifilm X-series and believe that the X100F makes for a better travel camera. Read all about why in my Best Travel Camera article. With that said, the Sony A7rII paired with rangefinder lenses is exceptional, as described in this article.

Travel photos with the Sony A7rII and Leica glass

Travel photography has always been a compromise between quality, bulk, weight and inconspicuousness. Putting together a travel friendly photo system that would deliver on all these points was a fun minimalist challenge. I used to shoot Nikon full-frame bodies paired with their top glass. The quality was there but the combos quickly became too heavy and cumbersome to carry around. That’s when I decided to switch to the A7 system. But as Sony would release new lenses, I’d fall back into the trap and buy them! I quickly realized that I was facing the same issues as before: my kit was too heavy and bulky again!

Travel photography

Travel photography in Thailand

I recently had the opportunity to travel to Thailand for three weeks. It was a backpacking trip and I committed to embracing lightweight traveling, even if it meant leaving some of the lenses home. I packed all my belongings in a 33L backpack and all my photography gear in a tiny messenger shoulder bag. To keep the kit minimal yet versatile, I chose all M-mount rangefinder lenses. I did my best to keep the total cost as affordable as possible (for M-mount lenses that is)!

Everything I packed fit in a carry-on sized backpack and camera bag. I won’t lie, I was pretty proud of the achievement! Here is the travel photography kit I ended up with for Thailand:

– Sony A7rII

– Voigtländer Close-Focus Adapter

– Voigtländer 15mm f/4.5 II Heliar

– Voigtländer 21mm f/4 Color-Skopar

– Leica 40mm f/2 Summicron

– Zeiss 50mm f/1.5 Sonnar

– Leica 90mm f/4 Macro-Elmar

– Leica 135mm f/4 Tele-Elmar

– Batteriesmemory cardsfiltersfilter pouchLeatherman Skeletool CXPedco UltrapodSony HVLF20M small flashremotewhite balance cardsmall air rocketMagicFiber clothPeak Design strap,  lens cleaning pen, simple pen

It was a little tight but everything listed above fit in a cheap and tiny water-resistant Bestek messenger shoulder camera bag.

I already owned the 15mm and 40mm lenses before this trip. I even had a tiny Leica 90mm f/2.8 Tele-Elmarit but sold it and splurged on the Macro version because it’s slightly better and collapsible. One of the main reasons I picked the 21mm, 40mm, 90mm and 135mm is because they all use the same 39mm filter thread, greatly simplifying filters. I also splurged on the 50mm because I’ve always wanted to play with that lens.

Let me tell you, exploring Thailand with such a small travel photography kit was an eye-opening blast. I can’t imagine myself traveling any other way, it’s just not worth it. Here is a brief write-up of my impressions about each lens paired on the A7rII.

The adapter is a no brainer for mounting M-mount glass on the A7 system (or any E-mount for that matter). It’s very well made and allows for much closer focusing distances than with standard adapters. I was hoping I’d receive the new Techart autofocus adapter for the trip but it didn’t make it in time. That being said, I’ve played a little with the Teacart since and while it works ok (only tried it on the 50mm), it searches a bit, is loud and bulkier. It also gets in the way of the L-Plate I use on the camera, making it almost impossible to use a tripod with an Arca-like plate. But, when it’s not searching for it, it does nail the focus nicely. After playing with it though, I realized I didn’t miss it.

This one was a little weird. For whatever reason, 15mm ended up being either too wide or not wide enough for what I was shooting. Maybe I’m not very good with super-wides but I just couldn’t find the right framing with it so it didn’t make it out of the bag very often. I might sound like an extremist minimalist but the 52mm filter diameter was a little too big for my taste! Corner performance isn’t the best out there but is still acceptable. Vignetting is probably more of an issue than smearing, but not that much of deal breaker either. I still love the lens for its small size and acceptable image quality.

If you concentrate only on landscapes in your travel photography, a higher image quality might be necessary. I also owned the new Voigtländer E-mount 15mm and while it does perform better, it is significantly larger and has an even larger filter thread. For these reasons, I ended up selling it!

Awesome little lens! Sure the corners aren’t 100% perfect but they are still pretty darn good. The 39mm filter threads and microscopic size make this lens a winner in my book. It pairs beautifully with the A7 system making for an extremely compact and discrete travel photography system.

I owned this lens before Sony came out with the A7 system. It doesn’t have the most pleasing bokeh and is not the sharpest lens on the A7rII. I still love it for it’s size and 39mm filter threads (I’m sure you are picking up the pattern here). I wanted a lens between 21mm and 50mm that would have corners more usable then the Zeiss 50mm, which I why I packed this one. It’s about the same size as the 21mm, so small misplacing it in the bag is almost a consideration! In the end though, I didn’t shoot it that much.

The Zeiss is just pure joy to shoot with. It was never designed to be sharp in the corners and therefore won’t be, even at f/8. If you know that going in and are OK with it, it’ll reward you with beautiful captures and a unique look in a very small package. I actually like the pop, colors and contrast of this lens better when it’s shot wide open than when it’s stopped down, even when shooting a distant subject. The 3D effect is intense and bokeh of course is creamy. Ironically though, the out-of-focus corners are somewhat sharper than the out-of-focus center. The only drawback I can think of is the 46mm filter threads. It is now the main lens attached to my A7rII and if you do a lot of travel photography portraits, take a good look at this lens.

Stellar performer, nothing bad to report here. I picked it because of it’s super small size, especially collapsed, and 39mm filter threads. Paired with the Voigtländer close-focus adapter, it gets decently close but I’m not sure I’d praise its macro ability just yet. I used to have the Sony E-mount 90mm f/2.8 macro, so it’s tough to compare the macro performance of the Leica to the excellent Sony lens. More testing needs to be done with the Leica close-focus adapter (I didn’t carry it on the trip). Maybe even some extension rings? Did I just say I didn’t shoot macro much?

Another stellar performer. It’s about as small as it gets for a lens in that focal range but it is heavy (505gr) and a little too long to fit nicely in the bag I chose. It performs great though, and of course has the beloved 39mm filter diameter.

The experience

I came back from the trip with loads of photos and a desire to minimize the rig even more! The 40mm and 50mm are too close and I shouldn’t have packed both after all, which I suspected might happen. I didn’t need as much corner sharpness in the 50mm focal range after all. I also preferred using the 21mm over the 15mm. While I really enjoyed shooting the 135mm, it’s just so large and heavy compared with the others lenses. I think I would’ve been fine with the 90mm only.

Shooting for three weeks with this ensemble was way more fun than I expected. The drawbacks with rangefinder glass on the Sony A7 system were eclipsed by the size, build, image quality and unique look. And let’s not forget the feeling you get manipulating such nice optics. It was such an enjoyable experience that most of my native E-mount lenses are now going up for sale! Having to switch between primes and shooting in manual focus greatly improved the percentage of “keepers” I came back with.

What about now?

Ever since I returned, I’ve been using the same bag but the only lenses you’ll find in it are the 21mm, 50mm and 90mm. I’m wondering if one of the 28mm or 35mm would be a good addition to this kit, especially for more landscape and street photography. Honestly, I haven’t felt a dire need for it and I can’t really afford the 28mm or 35mm I want! Maybe some of your readers have recommendations in that range. The only different travel photography set up I’d be interested in testing is the two Leica Tri-Elmar. I have no idea how they perform on the A7rII sensor though and if I can’t afford a Summicron, I certainly can’t afford the Tri-Elmar.

NOTE: I wrote this travel photography article for Steve Huff Photo, you can find the original article here.

Share:

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on pinterest
Share on whatsapp
Share on email

10 Responses

  1. Hey there–I’m about to pull the trigger on an A7iii and Voigtlander 50mm 1.4, and was checking out the camera paired with M-mount lenses. Your photos are beautiful, stunning. Very inspirational. Thank you for sharing.

    1. Hey Derron, I’m glad to hear you like the photos so much! Despite switching to Fujifilm, I have always enjoyed using my all the Sony A7 bodies, especially with m-mount lenses (I’ve shot the A7r, A7s and A7rII both with standard sensor and the Kolari thin filter upgrade for m-mount lenses).
      That said, I’m not familiar with the Voigtländer 50mm f/1.4 you speak of. I know they make a 40mm f/1.4 (Amazon) that isn’t perfect but lots of fun (I owned one!). They have the 40mm f/1.2 (Amazon) that people seem to adore, as well as the 50mm f/1.2 version (Amazon). Their 50mm f/1.1 isn’t regarded as a very good lens (Amazon). I imagine the lens you are talking about is their 50mm Nokton f/1.5 (Amazon). I’ve heard good things about this lens but never shot it myself. That’s because I had the Zeiss 50mm f/1.5 which I absolutely adored (Amazon). Paired with the A7 sensors, it created lovely images all in a very small package.
      Well, regardless, whichever lens you pair with the Sony A7iii (Amazon), I’m sure you’ll be happy.
      If you’re serious about M-mount lenses on the A7 system, do consider one of Kolari’s thin filter upgrades. It’s a serious commitment of course but if you know you’ll mostly be pairing the body with rangefinder lenses, the image quality is usually greatly improved! All the photos in this article DID NOT have that upgrade yet, so it’s not like M-mount lenses don’t work on the A7, they just work better with the upgrade.
      Hope this helps, enjoy your new camera!

  2. Hi!

    I loved your photos! I’ve used a Nikon Z6 with a Leica 28 2.8 and it was amazing! I had to let the lens go though, but I picked up a cheap 40 f2 summicron and I’m excited to see how it performs! I think the Z lenses are great! But can be a little too clinical at times; I’m excited to try something with a little more character

    1. That’s so great to hear! Yeah native glass is often amazing and sometimes a bit sterile. Congrats on a “cheap” 40mm f/2 Summicron. I’m sure you’ll love it. Embrace the bokeh character!

    1. Thank you so much Michael, glad you like the photos! It is indeed fun to try difference glass on these digital bodies. The M-mount definitely reminded me why I had picked the A7 system in the first place (mostly to have smaller gear). It’s always a welcomed bonus when the lenses actually perform well!

  3. Interesting kit… I have very similar in Fujiland…

    equiv of
    18mm
    24mm
    40mm
    50mm
    90mm
    135mm

    I think having the 21mm-40mm spread is a little too big of a gap for me, but could work!

    1. Well, I’ve since converted to Fuji as well. I would agree that 21mm is pretty wide and 40mm is already a bit tight. Some of these lenses are used on my Minolta CLE which has 28mm, 40mm and 90mm frame lenses. I wish I could’ve gotten my hands on a Leica 28mm f/2.8 but that just wasn’t feasible. A pretty large priority at the time was the ease of filters too. The 21mm Skopar is pretty amazing and shares the 39mm filter thread of the 40mm Summicron, 90mm Macro and 135mm. The 50mm and 15mm in this list were the exceptions to that rule.
      Anyhow, what’s your kit on Fuji?

  4. I made some recent change since that last post.

    Rokinon 8mm Fisheye (I de-fish it)
    Fuji 14mm 2.8
    Fuji 27mm 2.8
    Fuji 35mm 1.4
    Fuji 60mm 2.4 Macro
    Viltrox 85mm 1.8 STM

    The 90mm is probably better at long end but that’s not a length I use that much so went with the Viltrox that’s pretty good, too and more than half the price.

    There isn’t really an 8mm or 10mm prime for Fuji mount …There is the 9mm Laowa that looks pretty cool though. I had the Rokinon 12mm f2 before also…another cool manual lens! Lots of prime choices from other brands just no Fuji choices that wide for a prime.

    1. Very nice! I also had that 12mm f/2. Lovely though I ended up selling it. I do have the 9mm Laowa and it is awesome. Again though, I’m not finding myself using it much which is unfortunate. The Viltrox is great, I’ve enjoyed my version. Honestly I find that I mostly keep the 16-80mm f/4 on the X-T3 and swap it with the 35mm Mitakon when I want to get creative. As a matter of fact, I haven’t mounted my Fuji 35mm f2 on the X-T3 in a while.
      Of the other lenses you have, I’ve only shot the 27mm and it’s fun but lacks in performance for what I like. I’ve heard great things of the other lenses you have though have no personal experience.
      All good stuff though!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.